Multi-decade quality records, multi-tier supplier evidence, multi-jurisdiction trade compliance — on one platform.
The compliance question hits manufacturing from 3 sides at once. The IATF or AS9100 auditor wants quality records that go back to part inception. The supplier-quality team wants PPAP and SCAR evidence that doesn't disappear when an engineer leaves. The trade-compliance team wants REACH, RoHS, CMRT, and CBAM declarations they can defend.
Most manufacturing teams answer each of these from a different system. TeamSync answers them from one.
Talk to a manufacturing solutions engineer · See manufacturing use cases · Regulator coverage
What manufacturing teams use TeamSync for.
ECO velocity without breaking change-control.
Engineering Change Order cycle time is the canary. When it's 3 weeks, engineers route around the system. When it's 3 days, change-control becomes the path of least resistance. TeamSync's ECO surface is built around the workflow that hits 3 days as the realistic target — parallel review, automated routing, mobile approvals, audit anchors that satisfy IATF 16949 § 7.5. → VP Engineering page
BOM and AML accuracy across the supply chain.
The Bill of Materials and Approved Manufacturer List drift faster than the documentation can keep up. The reconciliation between PLM, ERP, and the supplier-quality system is a quarterly project that's usually still in progress when the audit arrives. TeamSync's platform provides the canonical version with bidirectional reconciliation against the operational systems. → Supplier Quality Director page
Supplier quality without the spreadsheets.
PPAP, SCAR, FAI, the corrective-action history per supplier per part — most organisations run this on a spreadsheet that's loved by one person and feared by the rest of the team. TeamSync's supplier-quality surface gives you the structure (typed records, retention rules, audit chain) without giving up the workflow flexibility the spreadsheet provided. → Quality Records Manager page
Trade compliance on one platform.
REACH, RoHS, CMRT, CBAM — each demands its own declaration, each cites its own evidence, each has its own audit cycle. The team that answers each from a different source is doing 4 times the work and shipping with 4 times the inconsistency risk. TeamSync's trade-compliance surface is one source, 4 shaped exports. → Regulatory Affairs page
Shop-floor capture that doesn't slow the line.
The line operator is not going to fight the system to log a non-conformance. Either it's faster than ignoring it, or the non-conformance gets ignored. TeamSync's mobile capture is structured to cost the operator under 30 seconds per event — barcode scan, voice note, optional photo, signed off and routed in the time it takes to walk to the next station. → Manufacturing Operations Director page
Where TeamSync fits with the manufacturing stack.
You keep your PLM (Windchill, Teamcenter, Aras). You keep your ERP (SAP, Oracle). You keep your MES on the shop floor. TeamSync sits underneath as the records-of-record platform, the supplier-quality registry, the trade-compliance source of truth, and the audit ledger.
| Layer | Stays | Layer TeamSync owns |
|---|---|---|
| PLM (Windchill, Teamcenter) | Yes | Document records of record |
| ERP (SAP, Oracle) | Yes | Master data documents + audit |
| MES | Yes | Shop-floor capture + non-conformance |
| Supplier portals | Coexist | Supplier evidence registry |
| Microsoft 365 | Yes | Records discipline + AI grounding |
Compliance, by name.
IATF 16949 · AS9100 · REACH · RoHS · CMRT · CBAM · SOC 2 Type II · ISO/IEC 27001:2022
See the manufacturing regulator map →
Read further.
- Manufacturing use cases — ECO, BOM/AML, supplier quality, trade compliance, shop-floor capture
- Customer references — anonymised outcomes by use case
- ROI — TCO model and savings categories
- Manufacturing role pages — VP Engineering, Supplier Quality Director, Quality Records Manager, Manufacturing Operations Director, Regulatory Affairs Manager
- Where to meet TeamSync — IMTS, MD&M, ARC Industry Forum, AAPEX